Author summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 1,071 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terri Gerstein results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 647 hits . Analysis detected 4,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,213 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,168 of 6,628 authors). This Terri Gerstein is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. Terri Gerstein
Author details
Total words: 3,213
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.4% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 11.2% 11.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.5% 14.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst