Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Voting Procedures results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 874 hits . Analysis detected 5,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,060 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,364 topics). This Voting Procedures is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Voting Procedures
Topic details
Total words: 6,060
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst