Topic summary
48% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voter Outreach results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 607 hits . Analysis detected 5,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,728 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (12,794 of 15,769 topics). This Voter Outreach is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group. Voter Outreach
Topic details
Total words: 7,728
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst