Topic summary
48%2 analyzed articles/videos2,576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voter Outreach results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 607 hits. Analysis detected 5,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,728 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (12,794 of 15,769 topics). This Voter Outreach is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Voter Outreach
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,728
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate