Topic summary
53% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Volunteering results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 1,329 hits . Analysis detected 7,695 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,084 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (10,817 of 15,759 topics). This Volunteering is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Volunteering
Topic details
Total words: 10,084
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst