I retired after 53 years in business. Now I raise guide dogs. 28%

By Kelly Burch11%

7/20/2026, 12:52:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 793 faulty-reasoning hits from 712 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.8% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,352 of 21,166 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the article peer group.

I ran my own businesses for 53 years. 
First, I did wholesale sales of tobacco and candy. 
When I sold my partnership stake after more than three decades, I decided to focus on candy and snacks, avoiding the negativity of tobacco. 
We expanded into novelty goods and nostalgia items, which turned out to be a very good decision: It was a more enjoyable workday, and the margins were bigger. 
I liked being an entrepreneur, but in my late 60s, I scaled back so I was only working about four hours a day. 
That's when I first started thinking about volunteer work. 
I knew I wanted a sense of purpose in the next phase of my life. 
I've always loved dogs, so I reached out to Guiding Eyes for the Blind, which has three puppy-raising facilities near me. 
I came for the dogs, but I stayed because the organization was so well-run. 
As a businessman, I appreciated that. 
I started volunteering regularly with Guiding Eyes for the Blind. 
I would help feed and walk dogs at the breeding kennel near my home. 
Often, I would bring a dog home with me in between my visits. 
While most dogs in the program are Labrador retrievers, about 10% are German Shepherds. 
The Shepherds are amazingly smart dogs, but they often struggle in the kennel  they can become overwhelmed and act out by barking or jumping. 
I had a German Shepherd in my 20s, and was immediately drawn to the breed again once I started volunteering. 
When I brought one home, the dog would immediately calm down and be able to fulfill its potential. 
I even hand-fed one dog, who was having a particularly difficult time with kennel life. 
A little over a year ago, I sold my business and officially retired. 
I was fostering a shepherd who was a stud in the breeding program. 
That dog, Kohl, was supposed to be a long-term placement in my home, and I was thrilled at the idea. 
He was the perfect fit for my family. 
Then Guiding Eyes decided to place Kohl in more formal training. 
I was a bit sad, but I thought if that's the plan, that's what we have to do. 
Kohl was meant to go on to bigger and better things. 
Right around the same time, I was asked to become a puppy raiser for one of Kohl's puppies. 
It seemed like the perfect timing. 
I was used to getting up at 7 a.m. every day and being out the door by 8. 
If I had a puppy to train, I could continue that schedule. 
I wanted to have structure in retirement and not find myself wondering, "What am I going to do today?" 
That's how I ended up with Geneva. 
About a month after she came home, we got a call that Kohl, her father, was being removed from the training program. 
I was thrilled to adopt him and have him join my mini Australian shepherd as a pet. 
Over the past year, I've attended training with Geneva, and loved her like the other dogs in my house. 
Still, I know she's not mine to keep: this summer, she'll be moving on to formal service dog training. 
Puppy raisers typically have a dog for about 14-18 months. 
When I give her treats or pats, I remind her (and myself) that she's going to do great things. 
The visually impaired people who use service dogs have had a tremendous impact on me. 
Hearing their stories showed me what a home run this program is, and I'm so glad to be part of it, even in a small way. 
I've met great dogs through Guiding Eyes, but I've also met great people. 
I have a community of probably 25 puppy raisers, who go on walks and have dinner together to celebrate when a puppy is ready to move on to formal training. 
Oftentimes, the puppy raiser already knows they'll be getting another placement. 
I'm not sure my wife is ready for that, but Guiding Eyes has told me there will be another shepherd puppy ready for placement in the fall, soon after Geneva leaves. 
I might not be able to say no. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.6%Kelly Burch: 1.9%Business Insider: 2.3%Confirmation Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Kelly Burch: 2.4%Business Insider: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.9%This article: 6.5%Kelly Burch: 2.5%Business Insider: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic6.5%This article: 3.9%Kelly Burch: 1.9%Business Insider: 1.0%Hindsight Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 2.5%Business Insider: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 1.5%Business Insider: 4.8%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Kelly Burch: 0.9%Business Insider: 0.7%Loss Aversion3.8%This article: 2.5%Kelly Burch: 1.1%Business Insider: 0.7%Status Quo Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.3%Kelly Burch: 5.2%Business Insider: 2.6%Optimism Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Kelly Burch: 0.9%Business Insider: 4.7%Negativity Bias6.9%This article: 3.9%Kelly Burch: 4.0%Business Insider: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.2%Business Insider: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.8%Kelly Burch: 0.1%Business Insider: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.8%This article: 2.0%Kelly Burch: 2.5%Business Insider: 0.7%In-Group Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 17.7%Kelly Burch: 5.4%Business Insider: 2.7%Halo Effect17.7%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 1.1%Business Insider: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.4%Kelly Burch: 1.5%Business Insider: 3.4%Appeal to Authority4.4%This article: 1.7%Kelly Burch: 2.0%Business Insider: 1.2%False Dilemma1.7%This article: 1.1%Kelly Burch: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.6%Slippery Slope1.1%This article: 2.5%Kelly Burch: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.1%Circular Reasoning2.5%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 2.3%Business Insider: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.6%Business Insider: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.9%Kelly Burch: 2.7%Business Insider: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion7.9%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 1.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.8%Kelly Burch: 1.4%Business Insider: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.8%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.2%Business Insider: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.2%Business Insider: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.8%Kelly Burch: 3.6%Business Insider: 3.5%Anecdotal13.8%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.1%Kelly Burch: 1.3%Business Insider: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.1%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.4%Kelly Burch: 0.6%Business Insider: 1.1%Unattributed Quote4.4%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.6%Business Insider: 3.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 1.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.1%Business Insider: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

712 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.