Topic summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video712 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Guide Dogs results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 1,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,963 of 16,559 topics). This Guide Dogs is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Guide Dogs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,136
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos