Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voices results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 614 hits. Analysis detected 5,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,310 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,923 of 16,559 topics). This Voices is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Voices
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,310
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos