Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voice Acting results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Loss Aversion, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,666 of 16,562 topics). This Voice Acting is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Voice Acting
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,796
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510017.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos