Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Visual Forensics results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 278 hits. Analysis detected 877 faulty-reasoning hits from 896 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (632 of 16,562 topics). This Visual Forensics is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
Visual Forensics

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510096.2% percentile
14.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles896 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 24.4%24.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 14.3%14.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 31.0%31.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 31.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos