Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Violence Prevention results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 744 hits. Analysis detected 5,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,007 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (14,939 of 15,689 topics). This Violence Prevention is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Violence Prevention
Topic details
Total words: 12,007
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751004.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles12K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos