Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Vigil results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 657 hits. Analysis detected 5,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,183 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Vigil is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos