Topic summary
⁠21%2 analyzed articles/videos2,528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vietnam War results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 639 hits. Analysis detected 7,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,315 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (11,962 of 15,878 topics). This Vietnam War is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Vietnam War
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,315
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos