Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vietnam results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 1,646 hits. Analysis detected 9,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,308 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,940 of 16,562 topics). This Vietnam is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Vietnam
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,308
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 19.8%19.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos