Topic summary
22% 1 analyzed article/video 1,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Video Doorbells results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 299 hits . Analysis detected 2,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,065 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,678 of 16,562 topics). This Video Doorbells is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Video Doorbells
Topic details
Total words: 4,065
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.6% Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst