Topic summary
90% 2 analyzed articles/videos 970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vice President results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 374 hits . Analysis detected 3,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,910 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 68% (5,444 of 16,562 topics). This Vice President is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Vice President
Topic details
Total words: 2,910
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.1% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst