Topic summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vetting results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 901 hits . Analysis detected 5,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,067 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (7,169 of 16,562 topics). This Vetting is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Vetting
Topic details
Total words: 5,067
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 8.1% 8.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst