Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Veterans Rights results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 2,342 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,662 of 16,562 topics). This Veterans Rights is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Veterans Rights
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,380
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.2%14.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos