Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Veterans Mental Health results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 669 hits . Analysis detected 2,951 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,509 of 16,562 topics). This Veterans Mental Health is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Veterans Mental Health
Topic details
Total words: 3,624
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst