Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Vermont History results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 371 hits. Analysis detected 2,199 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,003 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Vermont History is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Vermont History
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Vermont History (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,003
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.3%12.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos