Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Venice Biennale results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 484 hits. Analysis detected 3,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,071 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,231 of 16,562 topics). This Venice Biennale is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Venice Biennale
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,071
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos