Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hettie Judah results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 484 hits . Analysis detected 3,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,071 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,542 of 6,628 authors). This Hettie Judah is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. Hettie Judah
Author details
Total words: 4,071
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst