Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Venezuela U S Tensions results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 56.3% saturation with 688 hits. Analysis detected 3,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,221 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,706 of 16,486 topics). This Venezuela U S Tensions is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Venezuela U S Tensions
Topic details
Total words: 1,221
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.7% percentile
8.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 56.4%56.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 31.3%31.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 32.8%32.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 19.7%19.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 13.0%13.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 10.5%10.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.8%8.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.7%9.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 56.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 32.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 31.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos