Topic summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vehicle Lighting results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 518 hits. Analysis detected 3,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,151 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,157 of 16,562 topics). This Vehicle Lighting is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Vehicle Lighting
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠75%Vehicle Lighting (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,151
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.1%24.1%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.4%11.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Special Pleading: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos