Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Vehicle Design results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 44.5% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 341 faulty-reasoning hits from 256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Vehicle Design is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Vehicle Design

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles256 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 44.5%44.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.5%30.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.9%12.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 14.8%14.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 44.5%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos