Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaping results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 663 hits . Analysis detected 2,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,535 of 16,562 topics). This Vaping is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Vaping
Topic details
Total words: 2,868
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 23.1% 23.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst