Marty Makary departs FDA after clashes with Trump over fruit-flavored vapes 76%

By Melody Schreiber0%

5/12/2026, 2:14:19 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 1,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 956 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.2% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,461 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the article peer group.

Marty Makary resigned from his position as commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Tuesday, concluding a 13-month tenure at the regulatory agency that frequently drew the ire of the White House, Congress, industry and the public, Donald Trump confirmed on Tuesday. 
Kyle Diamantas, who previously worked as the top food official at the agency setting the strategic direction and operations for food policy in the US, will be Makary’s acting replacement. 
Trump called Diamantas a “very talented person” in a Truth Social post confirming he’d be Makary’s temporary replacement. 
“Please accept my resignation, effective today. 
During my tenure, I announced 50 major FDA reforms. 
Joe Biden’s FDA had none. 
I’m extremely proud that we have reduced drug review times from a year to 1-2 months, wrote new guidance to advance psychedelics, introduced a new ‘plausible mechanism’ pathway for rare disease drugs, and changed estrogen labels to tell women the truth about menopausal hormone replacement. 
It’s been the honor of a lifetime to serve as your FDA commissioner. 
I am forever grateful,” Makary appeared to write in a text shared by Trump on Truth Social. 
Politico first reported the resignation and Makary’s replacement. 
‘The FDA is a complete mess’: Trump makes fate of agency chief unclear as public trust plummets 
Trump signed off on a plan to fire Makary earlier this month, after the president scolded the FDA chief for not approving fruit-flavored vapes, according to the Wall Street Journal. 
“He seems fine,” Trump responded when asked about Makary on Friday. 
When pressed if he would fire Makary, Trump said: “I’ve been reading about it, but I know nothing about it.” 
On Tuesday, Trump told reporters at the White House that Makary is “a great guy” but “was having some difficulty”. 
“He’s a great doctor and he was having some difficulty, but he’s going to go on and he’s going to do well. 
Everybody wants that job,” Trump added. 
In a Truth Social post, Trump thanked Makary “for having done a great job at the FDA” and said “so much was accomplished under his leadership. 
He was a hard worker, who was respected by all, and will go on to have an outstanding career in Medicine.” 
Makary initially overrode agency scientists to halt the approval of the first fruit-flavored vapes on the market before the FDA announced the approval would move forward last week. 
The vapes weren’t the first stand Makary had taken as the FDA chief. 
He also clashed with lawmakers on Capitol Hill about drug regulation decisions and a review of mifepristone, an abortion medication, that conservative members of Congress accused him of slow-walking. 
There is abundant scientific evidence on the safety and importance of mifepristone. 
The FDA also reportedly stopped the publication of research on the safety of vaccines against shingles and Covid, demonstrating a “pattern” of “not letting information out that might support the general safety of vaccines”, said Janet Woodcock, former acting FDA commissioner. 
Other controversial decisions on vaccines included a refusal to consider Moderna’s new flu vaccine, a decision that was soon reversed after public backlash. 
The Trump administration has shied away from discussing its unpopular changes to routine vaccine recommendations before the midterm elections. 
“Vaccines have really gotten their attention,” said Peter Lurie, the executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest and a former associate commissioner at the FDA. 
“They do understand that they’ve gone too far for the American people on vaccines.” 
The FDA’s “mismanagement and bungled drug reviews” have “chilled investments in life-saving, innovative cures”, Darin LaHood, a Republican congressman from Illinois, said at the House ways and means committee budget hearing last month. 
Ron Johnson, a Republican senator from Wisconsin, said in March that he was investigating the FDA for rejections of rare disease treatments. 
Waves of layoffs and the appointment of inexperienced officials have created a “massive upheaval that has been an ongoing feature of daily work at FDA ever since the new administration began”, Lurie said. 
“It’s just endless chaos.” 
There have also been concerns about revamped guidelines for clinical trials, the commissioner’s new priority review vouchers and “data-free” regulatory decisions. 
In response to Makary’s resignation making headlines, Republican senator Josh Hawley called it “welcome news”. 
“Dr Makary was uniquely destructive to the prolife movement. 
He attempted to place pro-abortion lawyers in key positions. 
He slow walked a vitally necessary review of the abortion drug mifepristone. 
He used his discretion to approve a new abortion drug when the data shows it sends 1 in 10 women to the emergency room. 
He froze out prolife leaders and repeatedly stonewalled Congress. 
His resignation is an opportunity for the FDA to reset,” Hawley wrote on X. 
Meanwhile, Dick Durbin, the Senate Democratic whip, celebrated Makary’s departure for a contrasting reason, saying in a statement that he “voted for Dr Makary to head the FDA based upon his commitment to say ‘no’ if President Trump asked him to do something that would harm America. 
Dr Makary kept his word. 
He resisted Trump’s plan to expose millions of children to the dangers of vaping. 
“I hope Dr Makary will inspire others within the Trump Administration to grow a spine and put the families of America ahead of blind loyalty to this president,” Durbin continued. 
Several key positions in the Trump administration still remain vacant. 
Neither Nicole Saphier, Trump’s third pick for US surgeon general, nor Erica Schwartz, who would be the fifth director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the past year, have yet undergone the confirmation process before the Senate. 
Jay Bhattacharya, the director of the National Institutes of Health, is temporarily leading the CDC. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.7%Melody Schreiber: 4.2%the Guardian: 3.7%Confirmation Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.6%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.6%Melody Schreiber: 2.6%the Guardian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.6%This article: 3.0%Melody Schreiber: 1.0%the Guardian: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic3.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 1.4%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 1.4%the Guardian: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Melody Schreiber: 7.1%the Guardian: 6.1%Framing Effect1.2%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 2.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.8%Melody Schreiber: 1.6%the Guardian: 2.5%Optimism Bias11.8%This article: 2.2%Melody Schreiber: 2.2%the Guardian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias2.2%This article: 22.7%Melody Schreiber: 14.6%the Guardian: 10.4%Negativity Bias22.7%This article: 10.6%Melody Schreiber: 3.5%the Guardian: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias10.6%This article: 1.3%Melody Schreiber: 0.6%the Guardian: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.3%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 1.8%the Guardian: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.5%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.0%This article: 8.9%Melody Schreiber: 2.0%the Guardian: 3.2%Halo Effect8.9%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Melody Schreiber: 1.1%the Guardian: 1.2%Recency Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 2.4%the Guardian: 2.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.9%Melody Schreiber: 0.7%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man0.9%This article: 4.3%Melody Schreiber: 4.2%the Guardian: 3.8%Appeal to Authority4.3%This article: 8.1%Melody Schreiber: 1.9%the Guardian: 1.7%False Dilemma8.1%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.4%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.0%Melody Schreiber: 4.3%the Guardian: 6.3%Hasty Generalization9.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.6%Melody Schreiber: 9.0%the Guardian: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion14.6%This article: 2.5%Melody Schreiber: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.9%Begging the Question2.5%This article: 10.8%Melody Schreiber: 3.9%the Guardian: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.8%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.3%Melody Schreiber: 1.3%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.3%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.5%Melody Schreiber: 1.1%the Guardian: 3.1%Anecdotal2.5%This article: 0.9%Melody Schreiber: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.9%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.7%the Guardian: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.6%Melody Schreiber: 0.7%the Guardian: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.6%This article: 2.6%Melody Schreiber: 3.3%the Guardian: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection2.6%This article: 4.7%Melody Schreiber: 4.8%the Guardian: 10.4%Biased Writer Voice4.7%This article: 3.1%Melody Schreiber: 1.8%the Guardian: 1.8%Indoctrination3.1%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 2.8%the Guardian: 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melody Schreiber: 0.7%the Guardian: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

956 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers66%attributed speech329writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageMarty Makary • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMarty Makary • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMarty Makary • 45 words • 0.0% coverageMarty Makary • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMarty Makary • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWall Street Journal • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJanet Woodcock • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePeter Lurie • 29 words • 0.0% coveragePeter Lurie • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDarin LaHood • 33 words • 0.0% coverageRon Johnson • 22 words • 0.0% coveragePeter Lurie • 33 words • 0.0% coveragePeter Lurie • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Hawley • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Hawley • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Hawley • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Hawley • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Hawley • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Hawley • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Hawley • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDick Durbin • 47 words • 0.0% coverageDick Durbin • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDick Durbin • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDick Durbin • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Janet Woodcock

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words6.5% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.7 ptsWriter: 13.7%Janet Woodcock: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.4 ptsWriter: 2.4%Janet Woodcock: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Janet Woodcock: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.