Topic summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vampire Fiction results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 47.5% saturation with 578 hits. Analysis detected 2,878 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,218 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (801 of 16,562 topics). This Vampire Fiction is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Vampire Fiction
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,218
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510095.2% percentile
12.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 47.5%47.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 31.1%31.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 33.7%33.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 19.5%19.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 13.0%13.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.7%17.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.3%11.3%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 47.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 33.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 31.1%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Composition/Division: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos