Topic summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vampire Apocalypse results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Hindsight Bias , and Slippery Slope , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 787 hits . Analysis detected 4,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of â 54% (7,776 of 16,562 topics). This Vampire Apocalypse is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Vampire Apocalypse
Topic details
Total words: 3,724
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 21.1% 21.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst