Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaccine Research results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 302 hits. Analysis detected 1,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,075 of 16,335 topics). This Vaccine Research is better (less manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group.
Vaccine Research
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠20%Vaccine Research (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510020.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos