Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaccine Development results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 731 hits. Analysis detected 7,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,544 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (13,537 of 16,273 topics). This Vaccine Development is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Vaccine Development
Topic details
Total words: 9,544
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos