Topic summary
45%3 analyzed articles/videos903 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaccinations results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 836 hits. Analysis detected 7,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,846 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,528 of 16,562 topics). This Vaccinations is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Vaccinations
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,846
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate