Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos4,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vacancy results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 1,209 hits. Analysis detected 8,924 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,144 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (15,922 of 16,562 topics). This Vacancy is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Vacancy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 16,144
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751003.9% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos