Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Utility Regulations results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 641 hits. Analysis detected 2,914 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,913 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,129 topics). This Utility Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Utility Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 2,913
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.0%22.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos