Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Energy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 525 hits. Analysis detected 4,086 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,589 of 15,753 topics). This Utah Energy is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Utah Energy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.7%13.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.0%14.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos