Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video631 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Usa Vs Canada results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 47.6% saturation with 902 hits. Analysis detected 4,375 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,893 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,874 of 16,562 topics). This Usa Vs Canada is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Usa Vs Canada
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,893
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510088.7% percentile
8.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 47.6%47.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 36.2%36.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 27.7%27.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.1%17.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.6%12.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.6%7.6%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Topic 47.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 36.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos