Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Workforce results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 716 hits. Analysis detected 3,565 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,483 of 16,562 topics). This Us Workforce is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Us Workforce
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.0%24.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos