Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,248 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Trade Policy results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 839 hits. Analysis detected 5,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,563 of 16,562 topics). This Us Trade Policy is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Us Trade Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,992
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.3% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.8%16.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 9.4%9.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos