Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Us Television results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 2,449 hits. Analysis detected 10,558 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,704 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Us Television is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Us Television
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Us Television (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 7,704
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 31.8%31.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.2%18.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos