Topic summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Social Security Administration Data results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 1,339 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,779 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,294 of 16,562 topics). This US Social Security Administration Data is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
US Social Security Administration Data
Topic details
Total words: 1,779
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Special Pleading: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos