Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Us Presidential History results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 428 hits. Analysis detected 2,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Us Presidential History is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Us Presidential History
Topic details
Total words: 3,224
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos