Topic summary
⁠81%3 analyzed articles/videos2,076 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Presidential Elections results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 1,139 hits. Analysis detected 12,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,815 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,759 of 16,558 topics). This Us Presidential Elections is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Us Presidential Elections
Topic details
Total words: 7,815
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.5%14.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.5%13.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.6%14.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos