Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,242 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Regunberg results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Overconfidence Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 1,016 hits. Analysis detected 7,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,452 of 6,348 authors). This Aaron Regunberg is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Aaron Regunberg
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
78%Aaron Regunberg (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,968
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 20.4%20.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 15.4%15.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.1%6.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 20.4%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 15.4%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Author 12.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos