Topic summary
68%1 analyzed article/video461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Military Funding results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 308 hits. Analysis detected 1,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,383 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,389 of 15,914 topics). This US Military Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
US Military Funding
Topic details
Total words: 1,383
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.3%22.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos