Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Military Action results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 617 hits . Analysis detected 4,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,505 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (3,438 of 16,562 topics). This Us Military Action is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group. Us Military Action
Topic details
Total words: 2,505
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.2% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.5% 11.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 24.6% 24.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 22.7% 22.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst