Topic summary
63% 1 analyzed article/video 1,814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Law Enforcement results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 793 hits . Analysis detected 4,456 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,442 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,793 of 16,562 topics). This US Law Enforcement is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. US Law Enforcement
Topic details
Total words: 5,442
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst