Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Judiciary results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.9% saturation with 567 hits. Analysis detected 2,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,654 of 16,562 topics). This Us Judiciary is worse (more manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group.
Us Judiciary
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.0% percentile
8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 44.9%44.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 23.1%23.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 36.7%36.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 13.8%13.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 44.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 36.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos