Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Israel Iran Conflict results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 405 hits. Analysis detected 4,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,012 of 16,562 topics). This US Israel Iran Conflict is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
US Israel Iran Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 1,896
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 15.8%15.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.4%7.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.4%21.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.5%12.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.1%8.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos