Topic summary
ā 56%1 analyzed article/video1,307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Immigration Courts results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 1,221 hits. Analysis detected 6,111 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,755 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ā 40% (9,473 of 15,769 topics). This US Immigration Courts is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
US Immigration Courts
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 40%US Immigration Courts (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 7,755
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.7%15.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos