The Oaklandside35%
Deportation orders rise in Bay Area for immigrants who miss Trump admin’s new mega-hearings 40%
By Clara-Sophia Daly18%
7/22/2026, 5:30:00 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 282 hits. Analysis detected 1,526 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,307 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (12,325 of 20,445 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the article peer group.
Most who failed to show up at Concord Immigration Court in July for the new “mega master” hearings got deportation orders.
“It’s a trap,” one former immigration judge said.
On a recent Wednesday, Judge Li Eric Wong appeared on a flat screen TV mounted to the wall of a sparely decorated immigration courtroom in Concord, California.
He had 91 cases on his calendar for the day.
Up until this year, Wong and other immigration judges generally averaged 20 cases a day, but now, immigration courts across the country are holding “mega master calendar” hearings where upward of 100 cases may be slated for a single hearing.
The new mega-hearings are not about who shows up, say immigration attorneys and advocates, but about those who don’t.
As Judge Samantha Begovitch often warns the immigrants in her Concord courtroom, “If you do not show up in court when you are scheduled to appear, I can order you removed in your absence.”
That is happening frequently in Concord, according to new data, and the consequences are dire: A removal order terminates a pending immigration case and acts as an invitation for Immigration and Customs Enforcement to arrest and deport the subject.
In June, 684 immigrants, or 42 percent of the total number of immigrants with a mega master calendar hearing, were ordered removed in absentia at Concord, according to federal court data analyzed by data analysts Joseph Gunther and Brandon Marrow.
The mega hearings began in Concord on June 1.
The court opened in February 2024 to serve 10 northern and central California counties, including Alameda County (except for Oakland), and immigration hearings that were once held in San Francisco have largely moved there as well as the federal government shuttered or dramatically downsized San Francisco’s two immigration courts over the past 18 months.
Former immigration judge Jeremiah Johnson said of the hearings: “It’s a trap for those who do not show up, and a complete waste of time for those who do.”
At the recent hearing in July, only 48 of the 91 immigrants scheduled to appear showed up.
Even for them, the rules have changed.
Family members are usually not allowed unless they are named, and only two volunteers are allowed inside each court room to support immigrants.
For those who do show up to the modern office building in a suburban area of Concord, it’s a mostly mundane affair.
The court takes up three of the 10 floors where other establishments, including a financial firm and an urgent care clinic, also have offices.
There are 21 courtrooms, although many sit empty as there are only four in-person judges, seven online judges and two visiting judges.
Now, there is a mega master calendar hearing happening most weekdays.
On the Wednesday in July, immigrants awaiting their hearings sat on wooden benches, many with children by their side.
During his hearing, an immigrant from Honduras rose from the bench to sit at a small table set up in front of the television monitor where Judge Wong and a translator appeared on the screen.
“What is your name?”
Wong asked through an interpreter.
The judge then read out the address he had on file, and asked if it was up to date.
“Si,” the immigrant said.
“Yes,” said the translator.
“Do you have an attorney?”
the judge asked.
“No, I need more time.”
After a few exchanges about the asylum process, the judge set a hearing for June 26, 2028, the date given to all of the immigrants that day.
And, so the day went.
For the next four or so hours, Wong went through the cases of 48 immigrants in much the same manner.
The man — and many of the other immigrants on the docket that day — hadn’t been scheduled to appear in court again and discuss their cases until 2028.
But in late May or early June, their court date was suddenly moved up.
That could likely happen again and, again, put their status at risk, said Jere Ramsey, a volunteer data analyst who has been collecting data alongside courtroom observers.
Ramsey calculates that at least 71% of those who did not appear at their mega master hearing in June were ordered deported.
Why so many immigrants fail to appear
When someone’s immigration court date is changed, the Executive Office for Immigration Review sends out a letter informing them of their new court date and updates their online portal.
But it’s entirely possible for an immigrant to miss both, said Sergio Lopez, the volunteer coordinator for SAFE Center, a nonprofit that provides all kinds of support to immigrants, including legal support.
Addresses change, and so do attorneys.
Some immigrants may not have access to or know how to use a computer.
English fluency can be another barrier.
And even those who do find out about the change may be too afraid to show up in court.
“People don’t receive the notice in time, they miss it, and some others also get scared and they don’t show,” said Lopez.
“People are terrified,” said Vicky Benavente, a volunteer.
In June, a class-action lawsuit ruled that ICE cannot arrest immigrants outside courthouses.
But the courthouse arrests that took place in early 2025 still linger in the minds of immigrants, discouraging them to show up, said Lopez.
Earlier, when master calendar hearings were smaller, it was also more common for immigrants to have an attorney, according to advocates.
Between November 2025 and May 2026, according to the data compiled by Ramsey, 65 percent of immigrants who appeared in Concord did not have an attorney.
The consequences are stark: Nationwide, respondents who didn’t have an attorney only won their cases in immigration court in two percent of cases sampled.
Fighting back against removal orders
When someone is ordered removed at immigration hearings they failed to attend, they do have recourse: They can file a motion to reopen their case, or file an appeal within 30 days.
But that window only helps an immigrant who discovers they have missed a hearing in time to file.
And filing a motion is difficult for those who have no lawyer.
For those who do have a lawyer, the filing fee has become more expensive, shooting up from around $100 to more than $1,000.
Sometimes, after addressing the immigrants who appeared that day, a judge will go through those who did not appear and order a portion of those immigrants deported, on the spot.
On the Wednesday in July, Wong did not do this, according to the court observer present.
A day earlier, at the end of an individual hearing, another judge, Jacob Stender, read through a long list of no-shows from his previous mega master docket, ordering dozens of them removed from the country.
He referenced each by the first few digits of the so-called A-number used to track immigrants.
As he did this, a volunteer courtroom observer seated in the back row wrote down notes about each case, bearing witness to a seemingly administrative and mundane action that is at once life-or-death for some immigrants — many of who are asylum-seekers — who have been ordered removed to a country where their life may be in danger.
The mega master hearings are just another of the changes under the Trump administration that, immigration advocates and attorneys say, have transformed immigration courts from a pathway for immigrants to legalize their status in this country into a tool to rapidly arrest and deport them.
The Executive Office for Immigration Review thinks otherwise.
When asked questions about the purpose of master calendar hearings, a spokesperson for the agency replied, “Unnecessary delay hurts both aliens with meritorious claims and the American public, who wish to see aliens with non-meritorious claims removed as quickly as possible.”
Speakers
8speakers26%attributed speech966writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageExecutive Office for Immigration Review
41 attributed words12% of attributed speech54% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.