Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Us Government Agencies results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 172 hits . Analysis detected 1,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,338 topics). This Us Government Agencies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Us Government Agencies
Topic details
Total words: 1,128
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 8.7% 8.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Special Pleading: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst